Journal of Radiology Nursing RSS feed: Current Issue. The Journal of Radiology Nursing promotes the highest quality patient care in the diagnostic and therapeutic imaging environments. The content is intended to show radiology nurses how to practice with compassion, competence, and commitment, not only to patients but also to the profession of nursing as a whole. The journal's goals mirror those of the Association for Radiologic & Imaging Nursing: to provide, promote, maintain , and continuously improve patient care through education, standards, professional growth, and collaboration with other health care provides. http://www.radiologynursing.org/?rss=yesElsevier Inc.en © 2011 Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Journal of Radiology Nursing1546-0843304December 2011 © 2011 Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. healthpermissions@elsevier.comhttp://www.radiologynursing.org/article/PIIS1546084311001787/abstract?rss=yesInformation for Authors10.1016/S1546-0843(11)00178-7Journal of Radiology Nursing 30, 4 (2011)2011-12-01Journal of Radiology Nursing2011-12-01304S1546-0843(11)X0005-6e1e2http://www.radiologynursing.org/article/PIIS1546084311001714/abstract?rss=yesDecember is the month most often associated with giving gifts. Everyone likes to get a tangible gift now and then. As nurses, we know that not all “gifts” are welcome. By December most of us will have made sure to get our annual influenza immunization. A recent New York Times article entitled “A Mother’s War on Germs at Fast-Food Playlands () reminded us how the subject of disease transmission does not get the attention it should receive. I must confess, I routinely wipe off the grocery cart handle with the wipes provided (I hope it does some good, especially as we enter a season known for respiratory and gastro-intestional ailments). Do you know how far down the alphabet the letters go that identify the different types of hepatitis? In May 2011 an article entitled “Beating Back Bugs” () appeared in Scientific American. Its opening statement was frightening “It is the ultimate paradox of American health care: going to the hospital can kill you. Every year nearly two million hospital-acquired infections claim roughly 100, 000 lives and adds $45 billion dollars in costs.” These are very scary statistics. So, my point is: Take time, be careful, wash your hands and do all that you can to prevent the spread of pathogens whether it is from an unexpected sneeze or when preparing to access an intravenous line. You, your patients and co-workers will be glad you did.EditorialKathleen A. Gross10.1016/j.jradnu.2011.10.005Journal of Radiology Nursing 30, 4 (2011)2011-12-01Journal of Radiology Nursing2011-12-01304S1546-0843(11)X0005-6Editorial145145http://www.radiologynursing.org/article/PIIS1546084311001209/abstract?rss=yesAbstract: The impact of burnout on work performance and job satisfaction in nursing is well known. Burnout is known to influence job satisfaction, retention, and the nurses’ sense of moral cohesion. Burnout has also been associated with negative patient outcomes. Perception of factors associated with burnout may differ among nurses at different points of the professional trajectory. The purpose of this article is to discuss the impact of burnout on the nursing profession. This article will also address the concepts of burnout within the framework of an evolving concept, “good work in nursing,” and consider interventions to minimize risk for burnout among developing and veteran professional nurses to sustain a commitment to excellence in the nursing profession.Burnout and Its Impact on Good Work in NursingJoan F. Miller10.1016/j.jradnu.2011.07.004Journal of Radiology Nursing 30, 4 (2011)2011-12-01Journal of Radiology Nursing2011-12-01304S1546-0843(11)X0005-6Featured Articles146149http://www.radiologynursing.org/article/PIIS1546084311000526/abstract?rss=yesAbstract: The noise, lights, and tension of the modern hospital environment create stress for staff and patients alike. This article describes the efforts of nurses at the University of Virginia Health System, Interventional Radiology Department to create an oasis of calm and caring in the midst of a hectic, high-tech environment. Interventions evaluated included trial of a “quiet room,” educating nurses on relaxation and guided imagery techniques and purchase of MP3 players with relaxation music/exercises loaded. Anecdotal feedback from patients and staff, and a sustained increase in patient’s satisfaction scores indicate the effectiveness of these interventions.Encouraging Relaxation for Patients and Staff in a High-Tech EnvironmentCaroline McDaniel, Annette Z. Silver, Michelle Cormier, Marty Moran10.1016/j.jradnu.2011.03.005Journal of Radiology Nursing 30, 4 (2011)2011-12-01Journal of Radiology Nursing2011-12-01304S1546-0843(11)X0005-6Featured Articles150152http://www.radiologynursing.org/article/PIIS1546084311001222/abstract?rss=yesAbstract: The purpose of this correlation replication study was to determine (1) whether a relationship exists between a family’s anticipation of their child’s distress during a voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG) and the child’s level of distress during a VCUG, and (2) the level of family satisfaction with the information provided to them in preparation for the VCUG. A convenience sample of 44 families of children younger than 9 years undergoing a VCUG at the study site completed a Visual Analog Scale pre- and post-test questionnaire assessing the family’s perceptions of pain, fear, and distress. Families anticipated that their children would experience more fear, distress, and pain than they perceived. The level of family satisfaction regarding the information provided before the VUCG improved after their child’s VCUG. The families do not find the VCUG procedure as distressing as they had anticipated and the families’ anxiety at the time of the procedure greatly influenced their perceptions of pain, fear, and distress perceived in their child. Families were satisfied with the information regarding the VCUG procedure.Children, Voiding Cystourethrograms, and Family PerceptionsCarleeta M. Soltis, Debra Shelestak10.1016/j.jradnu.2011.07.006Journal of Radiology Nursing 30, 4 (2011)2011-12-01Journal of Radiology Nursing2011-12-01304S1546-0843(11)X0005-6Featured Articles153157http://www.radiologynursing.org/article/PIIS1546084311001155/abstract?rss=yesAbstract: With our aging population and an increased awareness of men's health issues, there has been an increase in screening and diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa). Screening for PCa commences with digital rectal examination (DRE) and a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) blood test, followed by examination with transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy. Very few authors have described the subjective experiences of men going through PCa screening nor the qualitative expressions that reflect their feelings, thoughts, and emotions. The purpose of this review was to explore the research literature on PCa screening to locate the voices of men going through the screening process. A literature search of databases, journal, and book references of articles in English, published between 1999 and 2009 was used. The main themes were expressed as, “Prostate Cancer Screening,” “Feelings and Emotions,” “Variations of Masculinity,” “Coping with Prostate Cancer Information,” and “Interactions with Doctors and Specialists.” This literature review revealed rich information that has the potential to inform the practice of PCa screening.A Thematic Review of Men's Experiences During the Waiting Period Between Prostate-Specific Antigen and Prostate Biopsy ResultsSusan Heyes, Ann Harrington, Jan Paterson10.1016/j.jradnu.2011.06.002Journal of Radiology Nursing 30, 4 (2011)2011-12-01Journal of Radiology Nursing2011-12-01304S1546-0843(11)X0005-6Featured Articles158169http://www.radiologynursing.org/article/PIIS1546084311001647/abstract?rss=yesOne of the teaching pearls I remember well from my didactic lectures when I was a new graduate neonatal intensive care unit nurse was the rule that pediatric patients are not small adults. In the many pediatric settings I have practiced as a nurse I know well that this statement reigns true for everything in pediatric medicine, not the least of which is the dose of pediatric radiation used for imaging studies and interventional radiology procedures.Just Pediatrics: Radiation and the Pediatric PatientSusanne M. Matich10.1016/j.jradnu.2011.08.003Journal of Radiology Nursing 30, 4 (2011)2011-12-01Journal of Radiology Nursing2011-12-01304S1546-0843(11)X0005-6Just Pediatrics170171http://www.radiologynursing.org/article/PIIS1546084311001258/abstract?rss=yesWhat is this? A CardioGen-82 positron emission tomography (PET) scan (PET myocardial perfusion imaging) is literally a closed system used to produce rubidium 82 (Rb-82) chloride injection for an intravenous administration. Rb-82 chloride injection is indicated for PET image of the myocardium under rest or pharmacologic stress conditions to evaluate regional myocardial perfusion in adult patients with or suspected existing coronary artery disease (CAD). This type of scan is useful in distinguishing abnormal myocardium from normal myocardium.Research Commentary: CardioGen-82 PET ScanMary Myrthil10.1016/j.jradnu.2011.08.001Journal of Radiology Nursing 30, 4 (2011)2011-12-01Journal of Radiology Nursing2011-12-01304S1546-0843(11)X0005-6Research Commentary172173http://www.radiologynursing.org/article/PIIS1546084311001763/abstract?rss=yesTable of Contents10.1016/S1546-0843(11)00176-3Journal of Radiology Nursing 30, 4 (2011)2011-12-01Journal of Radiology Nursing2011-12-01304S1546-0843(11)X0005-6FrontmatterA1A1http://www.radiologynursing.org/article/PIIS1546084311001775/abstract?rss=yesInformation for Readers10.1016/S1546-0843(11)00177-5Journal of Radiology Nursing 30, 4 (2011)2011-12-01Journal of Radiology Nursing2011-12-01304S1546-0843(11)X0005-6FrontmatterA2A2http://www.radiologynursing.org/article/PIIS1546084311001799/abstract?rss=yesEditorial Board/ Call for Manuscripts10.1016/S1546-0843(11)00179-9Journal of Radiology Nursing 30, 4 (2011)2011-12-01Journal of Radiology Nursing2011-12-01304S1546-0843(11)X0005-6FrontmatterA3A3