Featured ArticleMock Codes in a Radiology Department for Systems Improvement and Staff Competency
Section snippets
Methods
A series of identical mock codes was started in 2013 to identify systems issues and staff competency in responding to code events in the ground floor radiology department of the 550-bed Level 1 academic medical center. Each mock was unannounced and took place in a different part of the department. A Laerdal Resusci Anne® QCPR® manikin was used with the SimPad® SkillReporter™. This manikin provided objective CPR data that could be shared with staff during the debriefing. The simulated patient
Results
Table 1 shows the systems issues that were identified during the radiology mock codes centered around difficulties calling codes, operator paging issues, unclear room labeling, and wayfinding. For instance, during one of the mock codes, a staff member called the regular hospital operator number rather than the specially designated emergency number to call the code. Calling the regular number could result in being placed on hold if all the operators are busy. The emergency number is picked up
Remediation
In 2015, the radiology department completed a 5-year renovation project impacting six different modalities. The maze of hallways that previously existed in the department has been replaced with one long east-west hallway and four north and south branches. The radiology department is working with the facilities department to install blue directional ceiling lights to assist with wayfinding to critical events. The objective was to assist code team members when entering the radiology department
Conclusion
Limitations of this effort include the low number of mock codes run, although nearly the same deficiencies were noted at all the simulations. Another limitation is the relatively few radiology staff members and code team responders who participated compared with the total rosters of each of those groups. In future, more consistent mock codes and new mandatory participation requirements for all staff in FFMs and other resuscitation and team training simulations will continue to address this
Sally Rudy, MSN, RN-BC, CHSE, Simulation Educator, Penn State Hershey Clinical Simulation Center, Hershey, PA
References (16)
In situ and mobile simulation: lessons learned…authentic and resource intensive
Clinical Simulation in Nursing
(2013)- et al.
Excellence in performance and stress reduction during two different full scale simulator training courses: A pilot study
Resuscitation
(2009) - et al.
Resuscitation training for healthcare workers. (Editorial)
Resuscitation
(2009) - American Heart Association, (2010). 2010 AHA guidelines for CPR &...
- et al.
Simulation-based mock codes significantly correlate with improved pediatric patient cardiopulmonary arrest survival rates
Pediatric Critical Care Medicine
(2011) - et al.
In situ simulated cardiac arrest exercises to detect system vulnerabilities
Journal of Simulation in Healthcare
(2015) - et al.
Reflective learning: Key to learning from experience
Journal of Humanistic Psychology
(1983) - et al.
Improving cardiopulmonary resuscitation with a CPR feedback device and refresher simulations (CPR CARES Study): A randomized clinical trial
JAMA Pediatrics
(2015)
Cited by (0)
Sally Rudy, MSN, RN-BC, CHSE, Simulation Educator, Penn State Hershey Clinical Simulation Center, Hershey, PA
Vicki Rooney, RT(R), Radiology Assistant Manager, Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA
Eileen Westley-Hetrick, MSN, RN, Clinical Nurse Educator, Department of Nursing Education and Professional Development, Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA