Journal of Radiology Nursing
Volume 28, Issue 1 , Pages 3-11 , March 2009

Cone-Beam Computed Tomography for Breast Imaging

References 

  1. American Cancer Society . Cancer facts & figures 2007. Retrieved from http://www.cancer.org/docroot/STT/STT_0.asp2007;November 15, 2007
  2. Berg WA, Blume JD, Cormack JB, Mendelson EB, Lehrer D, Bohm-Velez M, et al. Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs. mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer. Journal of the American Medical Association. 2008;299(18):2151–2163
  3. Berg WA, Gutierrez L, NessAiver MS, Carter WB, Bhargavan M, Lewis RS, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer. Radiology. 2004;233(3):830–849
  4. Bird RE, Wallace TW, Yankaskas BC. Analysis of cancers missed at screening mammography. Radiology. 1992;184(3):613–617
  5. Boetes C, Mus RD, Holland R, Barentsz JO, Strijk SP, Wobbes T, et al. Breast tumors: comparative accuracy of MR imaging relative to mammography and US for demonstrating extent. Radiology. 1995;197(3):743–747
  6. Boone JM, Kwan AL, Seibert JA, Shah N, Lindfors KK, Nelson TR. Technique factors and their relationship to radiation dose in pendant geometry breast CT. Medica Physica. 2005;32(12):3767–3776
  7. Boyce J. Cornell University Program on breast cancer and environmental risk factors. ionizing radiation and breast cancer risk: fact sheet #52. Retrieved from http://envirocancer.cornell.edu/factsheet/physical/fs52.radiation.cfm2005;November 15, 2007
  8. Brem RF, Floerke AC, Rapelyea JA, Teal C, Kelly T, Mathur V. Breast-specific gamma imaging as an adjunct imaging modality for the diagnosis of breast cancer. Radiology. 2008;247(3):651–657
  9. Brown ML, Houn F, Sickles EA, Kessler LG. Screening mammography in community practice: positive predictive value of abnormal findings and yield of follow-up diagnostic procedures. AJR American Journal of Roentgenology. 1995;165(6):1373–1377
  10. Chen B, Ning R. Cone-beam volume CT breast imaging: feasibility study. Medica Physica. 2002;29(5):755–770
  11. Chen Z, Ning R. Why should breast tumour detection go three dimensional?. Physics in Medicine and Biology. 2003;48(14):2217–2228
  12. Elmore JG, Miglioretti DL, Reisch LM, Barton MB, Kreuter W, Christiansen CL, et al. Screening mammograms by community radiologists: variability in false-positive rates. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 2002;94(18):1373–1380
  13. Fischer U, von Heyden D, Vosshenrich R, Vieweg I, Grabbe E. Signal characteristics of malignant and benign lesions in dynamic 2D-MRT of the breast. Rofo. 1993;158(4):287–292
  14. Fobben ES, Rubin CZ, Kalisher L, Dembner AG, Seltzer MH, Santoro EJ. Breast MR imaging with commercially available techniques: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiology. 1995;196(1):143–152
  15. Gilles R, Guinebretiere JM, Lucidarme O, Cluzel P, Janaud G, Finet JF, et al. Nonpalpable breast tumors: diagnosis with contrast-enhanced subtraction dynamic MR imaging. Radiology. 1994;191(3):625–631
  16. Glick SJ, Thacker S, Gong X, Liu B. Evaluating the impact of X-ray spectral shape on image quality in flat-panel CT breast imaging. Medica Physica. 2007;34(1):5–24
  17. Gulsun M, Demirkazik FB, Ariyurek M. Evaluation of breast microcalcifications according to breast imaging reporting and data system criteria and Le Gal's classification. European Journal of Radiology. 2003;47(3):227–231
  18. Harms SE, Flamig DP, Hesley KL, Meiches MD, Jensen RA, Evans WP, et al. MR imaging of the breast with rotating delivery of excitation off resonance: clinical experience with pathologic correlation. Radiology. 1993;187(2):493–501
  19. Hendrick RE, Bassett L, Botsco MA, Deibel D, Feig S, Gray J, et al. Mammography Quality Control Manual. American College of Radialogy. 1999;284:
  20. Hendrick RE, Smith RA, Rutledge JH, Smart CR. Benefit of screening mammography in women aged 40-49: a new meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Journal of the National Cancer Institute Monographs. 1997;22:87–92
  21. Hulka CA, Smith BL, Sgroi DC, Tan L, Edmister WB, Semple JP, et al. Benign and malignant breast lesions: differentiation with echo-planar MR imaging. Radiology. 1995;197(1):33–38
  22. Jackson VP, Hendrick RE, Feig SA, Kopans DB. Imaging of the radiographically dense breast. Radiology. 1993;188(2):297–301
  23. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Murray T, Xu J, Thun MJ. Cancer statistics, 2007. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 2007;57(1):43–66
  24. Karssemeijer N, Frieling JT, Hendriks JH. Spatial resolution in digital mammography. Investigative Radiology. 1993;28(5):413–419
  25. Kerlikowske K, Grady D, Barclay J, Sickles EA, Eaton A, Ernster V. Positive predictive value of screening mammography by age and family history of breast cancer. Journal of the American Medical Association. 1993;270(20):2444–2450
  26. Kopans DB, Moore RH, McCarthy KA, Hall DA, Hulka CA, Whitman GJ, et al. Positive predictive value of breast biopsy performed as a result of mammography: there is no abrupt change at age 50 years. Radiology. 1996;200(2):357–360
  27. Kuhl CK, Schrading S, Leutner CC, Morakkabati-Spitz N, Wardelmann E, Fimmers R, et al. Mammography, breast ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging for surveillance of women at high familial risk for breast cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2005;23(33):8469–8476
  28. Lazzari B, Belli G, Gori C, Rosselli Del Turco M. Physical characteristics of five clinical systems for digital mammography. Medical Physics. 2007;34(7):2730–2743
  29. Lindfors KK, Boone JM, Nelson TR, Yang K, Kwan AL, Miller DF. Dedicated breast CT: initial clinical experience. Radiology. 2008;246(3):725–733
  30. Mahesh M. AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents: digital mammography: an overview. Radiographics. 2004;24(6):1747–1760
  31. Mandelson MT, Oestreicher N, Porter PL, White D, Finder CA, Taplin SH, et al. Breast density as a predictor of mammographic detection: comparison of interval- and screen-detected cancers. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 2000;92(13):1081–1087
  32. McKinley RL, Tornai MP, Brzymialkiewicz C, Madhav P, Samei E, Bowsher JE. Analysis of a novel offset cone-beam computed mammotomography system geometry for accommodating various breast sizes. Physica Medica. 2006;21(Suppl. 1):48–55
  33. Meyer JE, Eberlein TJ, Stomper PC, Sonnenfeld MR. Biopsy of occult breast lesions. Analysis of 1261 abnormalities. Journal of the American Medical Association. 1990;263(17):2341–2343
  34. Ning R, Chen B, Conover D, McHugh L, Cullinan J, Yu R. Flat panel detector-based cone beam volume CT mammography imaging: preliminary phantom study. Medical Imaging 2001: Physics of Medical Imaging 2001. Proceedings of SPIE. 2001;4320:601–610
  35. Ning R, Conover D, Chen B, McHugh L, Cullinan J, Yu R. Flat panel detector-based cone beam volume CT beast imaging: phantom and specimen study. Medical Imaging 2002: Physics of Medical Imaging 2002. Proceedings of SPIE. 2002;4682:218–227
  36. Ning, R., Conover, D., Lu, X., Zhang, Y., Yu, Y., Schiffhauer, L., Cullinan, J. (2005). Evaluation of flat panel detector cone beam CT breast imaging with different sizes of breast phantoms. Medical Imaging 2005: Physics of Medical Imaging 2005. Proceedings of SPIE, 5745 (SPIE, Bellingham, WA, 2005), 626-636.
  37. Ning R, Conover D, Yu Y, Schiffhauer L, Cullinan J, Robinson A. Real time flat panel detector-based cone beam CT breast imaging: phantom and specimen study. Medical Imaging 2003: Physics of Medical Imaging 2003. Proceedings of SPIE. 2003;5030:185–190
  38. Ning R, Conoverm D, Yum Y, Zhangm Y, Caim W, Lum X, et al. A novel cone beam CT scanner: preliminary system evaluation. Medical Imaging 2006: Physics of Medical Imaging 2006. Proceedings of SPIE, Belingham, WA: SPIE. 2006;6142:111–119
  39. Ning R, Tang X, Conover D, Yu R. Flat panel detector-based cone beam computed tomography with a circle-plus-two-arcs data acquisition orbit: preliminary phantom study. Medica Physica. 2003;30(7):1694–1705
  40. Ning R, Yu Y, Conover D, Lu X, He H, Chen Z, et al. Preliminary system characterization of flat panel detector-based cone beam CT for breast imaging. Medical Imaging 2004: Physics of Medical Imaging 2004. Proceedings of SPIE. 2004;5368:292–303
  41. Nystrom L, Andersson I, Bjurstam N, Frisell J, Nordenskjold B, Rutqvist LE. Long-term effects of mammography screening: updated overview of the Swedish randomised trials. Lancet. 2002;359(9310):909–919
  42. Persliden J, Fransson V, Vitak B, Fagerberg G. Comparison of image quality and mean absorbed dose to the breast for two mammographic films. Acta Radiologic. 1993;34(4):351–355
  43. Radford DM, Cromack DT, Troop BR, Keller SM, Lopez MJ. Pathology and treatment of impalpable breast lesions. American Journal of Surgery. 1992;164(5):427–431discussion 431–432
  44. Radiological Society of North America . Safety: radiation exposure in x-ray examinations. Retrieved from http://www.radiologyinfo.org/en/safety/index.cfm?pg=sfty_xray&bhcp=12007;November 15, 2007
  45. Saslow D, Boetes C, Burke W, Harms S, Leach MO, Lehman CD, et al. American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 2007;57(2):75–89
  46. U.S. Food and Drug Administration . Mammography Quality Standards Act regulations: 900.12 quality standards: Section (e), part (5) Dosimetry in Mammography Quality Standards Act regulations. http://www.fda.gov/CDRH/MAMMOGRAPHY/frmamcom2.html2002;Retrieved from November 15, 2007
  47. Yang WT, Carkaci S, Chen L, Lai CJ, Sahin A, Whitman GJ, et al. Dedicated cone-beam breast CT: feasibility study with surgical mastectomy specimens. AJR American Journal of Roentgenology. 2007;189(6):1312–1315

PII: S1546-0843(08)00172-7

doi: 10.1016/j.jradnu.2008.12.003

Journal of Radiology Nursing
Volume 28, Issue 1 , Pages 3-11 , March 2009

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution